The work plan for further and national
steps support must be well articulated with the previewed plan for complete
system development under EU support. Therefore before description of the work
plan for first stages, the role played within the whole system deployment is as
follows.
4.1 DomusBITae overall workplan
The plan envisaged for Domus BITae
deployment is divided in the following work-packages
WP-1: Design of the
DomusBITae Knowledge System (specification of modules)
WP-2: Development of Web
Template
WP-3: Development of
Directory of Information Studies Communities
WP-4: Dumping of FIS, SoII and
BITrum into DomusBITae
WP-5: Development of
Repository: institutional and thematic
WP-6: Dumping of
preliminary contents into Repository
WP-7: Development of
Working Group Toolkit
WP-8: Development of eMeeting
Room
WP-9: Development of
Meta-community glossary
WP-10: Integration and
assessment of the DommusBITae system
WP-11: Launching the
DommusBITae system
WP-12: Coordination and
neetworking
The asked support for further and
national stages mainly concern WP1 (for core system), WP2 and WP4. In the PERT
diagram (figure 3), the relation among the different tasks for the whole system
development and the work related to this first-stages proposal (shaded) is
clearly shown.
A network-system for the collaborative
work in proposals, fitted to the corresponding calls, has been developed and
started to work in January 2010, named StylusBITae and announced to the
involved institutions (users StylusBITae).
Figure 3: PERT diagram for domusBITae
development. Shaded the work corresponding to further and national steps proposal
(this action)
4.2 Strategy for further and national steps development
To engage the necessary parts to develop
the virtual community, we plan to make a combination of system development,
community gathering and proposal advance, following next steps:
First, a critical team must be committed for the development of the
demonstration and training system (including module 1 of the system depicted in
figure 1); and a scientific and technical committees must be gathered for the
supervision and approval of design and developments.
Second, the system is designed following target necessities and knowledge
oriented system criteria.
Third, the core system is developed and launched after instantiation of
well centred international communities (FIS and SoII)
Forth, the initiative is disseminated for international support in the
target community and the design is steered by means of a preliminary appraisal
of the demonstration system from the target community.
Five, a consortium is elected and a kernel proposal (adaptable to
different calls) agreed for international competition.
4.3 Work packages, Milestones and deliverables
Work-packages:
WP1: Knowledge oriented
system design, leaded by UB
WP2: Development of
web-templates according to system design and dumping of first communities for
demonstration (SoII and FIS)
WP3: Designing and
development of demonstration modules of the planed e-Infrastructures for the
virtual community. Assessment by a target community representation
WP4: Call for international
community support: scientific committee, open community, including design
approval and consortium constitution (for that means, the participation in some
international gathers, where coordinators act as co-organisers, is planned for
promotion of domusBITae (see [BITrum site]>[3. activities]>[gathering
& meetings]).
WP5: Coordination
of development, scientific and management committees.
Timing: (two degrees of activity are
distinguished)
WP
|
Months:
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
1
|
Design
|
|
|
|
▲1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲2
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
eInfrastructures
des.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲3
|
|
|
5
|
Coordination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲4
|
Months:
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
Milestones:
M1: System design approval
M2: Launching demonstration system with three representative
communities
M3: eInfrastructure preliminary design approval
M4: Assessment and final report
Deliverables:
D1: System blueprint (wireframes), WP1
D2: Template, WP2 (mid term)
D3: Core system demonstrator (with three communities), WP2
D4: eInfrastructures blueprint, WP3
D5: DomusBITae consortium constitutional agreement, WP4
D6: Final report (including: assessment report, strategy for ERA
deployment, consortium constitution)
Resources to be committed:
WP1: 3 person-months / 2PC /
SW (Marginal costs: 1.5 person-months, HW, SW)
WP2: 6 person-month / SW (Marginal
costs: 5 person-month, SW)
WP3: 4 person-month / SW
(Marginal costs: 2 person-month, SW).
WP4: 5 person-month / Travel
expenses: 3 individual national displacements, 2 international displacements
(Marginal costs: travel expenses)
WP4: 6 person-month / Travel
expenses for working meetings and target community assessment and approval: 6
individual national displacements (Marginal costs: 2 person-month, SW, travel
expenses)